A Parallel Pandemic: Increased Firearm Injuries at Five Northern California Trauma Centers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Interrupted Time-series Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize changes in firearm injuries at 5 level 1 trauma centers in Northern California in the 12 months following the start of the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the preceding 4 years, accounting for regional variations and seasonal trends. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: Increased firearm injuries have been reported during the early peaks of the COVID-19 pandemic despite shelter-in-place restrictions. However, these data are overwhelmingly from singlecenter studies, during the initial phase of the pandemic prior to lifting of shelter-in-place restrictions, or do not account for seasonal trends. METHODS: An interrupted time-series analysis (ITSA) of all firearm injuries presenting to 5 adult level 1 trauma centers in Northern California was performed (January 2016to February 2021). ITSA modeled the association of the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020) with monthly firearm injuries using the ordinary least-squares method, included month indicators to adjust for seasonality, and specified lags of up to 12 months to account for autocorrelation. RESULTS: Prior to the start of COVID-19, firearm injuries averaged (±SD) of 86 (±16) and were decreasing by 0.5/month (P < 0.01). The start of COVID- 19 (March 2020) was associated with an alarming increase of 39 firearm injuries/month (P < 0.01) followed by an ongoing rise of 3.5/mo (P < 0.01). This resulted in an average of 130 (±26) firearm injuries/month during the COVID-19 period and included 8 of the 10 highest monthly firearm injury rates in the past 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: These data highlight an alarming escalation in firearm injuries in the 12 months following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in Northern California. Additional studies and resources are needed to better understand and address this parallel public health crisis.

Mortality in hypotensive trauma patients requiring laparotomy is related to degree of hypotension and provides evidence for focused interventions.

BACKGROUND: Mortality in hypotensive patients requiring laparotomy is reported to be 46% and essentially unchanged in 20 years. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been incorporated into resuscitation protocols in an attempt to decrease mortality, but REBOA can have significant complications and its use in this patient group has not been validated. This study sought to determine the mortality rate for hypotensive patients requiring laparotomy and to evaluate the mortality risk related to the degree of hypotension. Additionally, this study sought to determine if there was a presenting systolic blood pressure (SBP) that was associated with a sharp increase in mortality to target the appropriate patient group most likely to benefit from focused interventions such as REBOA. METHODS: The trauma registry at a level I trauma center was reviewed for patients undergoing emergent laparotomy from January 2007 to June 2020. Data included demographics, mechanism of injury, physiological data, Injury Severity Score, blood products transfused, and outcomes. Group comparisons were based on initial SBP (0 to 50 mm Hg, 60 to 69 mm Hg, 70 to 79 mm Hg, 80 to 89 mm Hg, and ≥90 mm Hg). RESULTS: During the study period, 52 016 trauma patients were treated and 1174 required laparotomy within 90 min of arrival; 424 had an initial SBP of <90 mm Hg. The overall mortality rate was 18%, but mortality increased as SBP decreased (≥90=9%, 80 to 89=20%, 70 to 79=21%, 60 to 69=48%, 0 to 59=66%). Mortality increased sharply with SBP of <70 mm Hg. DISCUSSION: Mortality rate increases with worsening hypotension and increases sharply with an SBP of <70 mm Hg. Further study on focused interventions such as REBOA should target this patient group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level III.

Admission base deficit is superior to lactate in identifying shock and resuscitative needs in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Base Deficit (BD) and lactate have been used as indicators of shock and resuscitation. This study was done to evaluate the utility of BD and lactate in identifying shock and resuscitative needs in trauma patients. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed from 3/2014-12/2018. Data included demographics, admission systolic BP, ISS, BD, lactate, blood transfusion, and outcomes. BD and lactate were modeled continuously and categorically and compared. RESULTS: 2271 patients were included. BD and lactate were moderately correlated (r2 = 0.63 p < 0.001). On univariate regression, BD and lactate were associated with transfusion requirement and mortality (p < 0.001), but on multivariate regression, only BD was associated with transfusion requirement and mortality (OR = 1.2, p < 0.001; OR = 1.1, p < 0.001, respectively). BD discriminated better than lactate for hypotension, higher ISS, increased transfusion requirements and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Admission BD and lactate levels are correlated following injury, but BD is superior to lactate in identifying shock, resuscitative needs and mortality in severely injured trauma patients.

Repeat computed tomography head scan is not indicated in trauma patients taking novel anticoagulation: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The number of trauma patients on prehospital novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is increasing. After an initial negative computed tomography of the head (CTH), practice patterns are variable for obtaining repeat CTH to evaluate for delayed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH-d). However, the risks and outcomes of ICH-d for patients on NOACs are unclear. We hypothesized that, for these patients, the incidence of ICH-d is low, similar to that of warfarin, and when it occurs, it does not result in clinically significant worse outcomes. METHODS: Five level 1 trauma centers in Northern California participated in a retrospective review of anticoagulated trauma patients. Patients were included if their initial CTH was negative. Primary outcomes were incidence of ICH-d, neurosurgical intervention, and death. Patient factors associated with the outcome of ICH-d were determined by multivariable regression. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2018, 777 patients met the inclusion criteria (NOAC, n = 346; warfarin, n = 431), 54% of whom received a repeat CTH. Delayed intracranial hemorrhage incidence was 2.3% in the NOAC group and 4% in the warfarin group (p = 0.31). No NOAC patient with ICH-d required neurosurgical intervention or died because of their head injury. Two warfarin patients received neurosurgical intervention, and three died from their head injury. Head Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥3 was associated with increased odds of developing ICH-d (adjusted odds ratio, 32.70; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The incidence of ICH-d in patients taking NOAC is low. In this study, patients on NOACs who developed ICH-d after an initial negative CTH did not need neurosurgical intervention or die from their head injury. Repeat CTH in this patient population does not appear necessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.Therapeutic, level IV.

Intercostal Nerve Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Epidural Analgesia for the Treatment of Traumatic Rib Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Rib fractures are common among trauma patients and analgesia remains the cornerstone of treatment. Intercostal nerve blocks provide analgesia but are limited by the duration of the anesthetic. This study compares outcomes of epidural analgesia with intercostal nerve block using liposomal bupivacaine for the treatment of traumatic rib fractures. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was used to identify patients who received either epidural analgesia or intercostal nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine for the treatment of traumatic rib fractures. Patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio on age, Injury Severity Score, and number of rib fractures. Outcomes included intubations, mechanical ventilation days, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and mortality. RESULTS: After matching, 116 patients were included in the study. Patients receiving intercostal nerve blocks with liposomal bupivacaine were less likely to require intubation (3% vs 17%; p = 0.015), had shorter hospital LOS (mean ± SD 8 ± 6 days vs 11 ± 9 days; p = 0.020) and ICU LOS (mean ± SD 2 ± 5 days vs 5 ± 6 days; p = 0.007). There were no differences in ventilator days or mortality. Minor complications occurred in 26% of patients that received an epidural catheter for rib fractures. No complications occurred in the patients receiving intercostal nerve block. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received intercostal nerve blocks with liposomal bupivacaine required intubation less frequently and had shorter ICU and hospital LOS compared with epidural analgesia patients. These results suggest that intercostal nerve blocks with liposomal bupivacaine might be equal or superior to epidural analgesia.

Prospective evaluation of admission cortisol in trauma.

BACKGROUND: A low cortisol level has been shown to occur soon after trauma, and is associated with increased mortality. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of low cortisol levels in acute critically ill trauma patients. We hypothesized that patients would require increase vasopressor use, have a greater blood product administration, and increased mortality rate. METHODS: A blinded, prospective observational study was performed at an American College of Surgeons verified Level I trauma center. Adult patients who met trauma activation criteria, received initial treatment at Community Regional Medical Center and were admitted to the intensive care unit were included. Total serum cortisol levels were measured from the initial blood draw in the emergency department. Patients were categorized according to cortisol ≤15 µg/dL (severe low cortisol, SLC), 15.01-25 µg/dL (relative low cortisol, RLC), or >25 µg/dL (normal cortisol, NC) and compared on demographics, injury severity score, initial vital signs, blood product usage, vasopressor requirements, and mortality. RESULTS: Cortisol levels were ordered for 280 patients; 91 were excluded and 189 were included. Penetrating trauma accounted for 19% of injuries and blunt trauma for 81%. 22 patients (12%) had SLC, 83 (44%) had RLC, and 84 (44%) had NC. This study found patients with admission SLC had higher rates of vasopressor requirements, required more units of blood, and had a higher mortality rate than both the RLC and NC groups. CONCLUSION: Low cortisol level can be identified acutely after severe trauma. Trauma patients with SLC had larger blood product requirements, vasopressor use, and increase mortality. Initial cortisol levels are useful in identifying these high-risk patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.

Changes in splenic capsule with aging; beliefs and reality.

BACKGROUND: Research describing the splenic capsule and its effect on non-operative management of splenic injuries is limited. The aim of this study is to identify the current beliefs about the splenic capsule thickness and investigate changes in the splenic capsule with age. METHODS: Trauma Medical Directors were surveyed on their beliefs regarding splenic capsule thickness changes with age. Thicknesses of cadaveric splenic capsule samples were measured. RESULTS: The majority of trauma medical directors (59%) believe the capsule thickness decreases with age. There were 94 splenic specimens obtained. The splenic capsules of infants were thin and had a uniform layer of elastin fibers. With aging, the capsule becomes thick and develops a collagen layer. CONCLUSION: Most trauma directors believe the splenic capsule thickness decreases with age. However, our results demonstrate that the splenic capsule thickness increases during childhood but remains constant in adulthood.

The impact of obesity on severity of solid organ injury in the adult population at a Level I trauma center.

BACKGROUND: The obese (body mass index, BMI > 30) have been identified as a subgroup of patients in regards to traumatic injuries. A recent study found that high-grade hepatic injuries were more common in obese than non-obese pediatric patients. This study seeks to evaluate whether similar differences exist in the adult population and examine differences in operative versus non-operative management between the obese and non-obese in blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: Patient with trauma evaluated at an American College of Surgeons verified Level I trauma center from February 2013 to November 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients aged >18 years with blunt mechanism of injury and a BMI listed in the trauma registry were included. Patients were excluded for incomplete data, including BMI or inability to grade hepatic or splenic injury. Data collected included age, gender, BMI, injury severity score, hospital length of stay, procedures on liver or spleen, and mortality. Organ injuries were scored using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grading scales, and were determined by either imaging or intraoperative findings. Obesity was classified as BMI > 30 compared with non-obese with BMI < 30. RESULTS: During the study period, 9481 patients were included. There were 322 spleen injuries and 237 liver injuries, with 64 patients sustaining both liver and splenic injuries. No differences existed in the percentage of high-grade hepatic or splenic injuries between the obese and non-obese. Obese patients with liver injuries were more likely to have procedural intervention than non-obese liver injuries and had higher rates of mortality. No differences were found in intervention for splenic injury between obese and non-obese. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to prior studies on adult and pediatric patients with trauma, this study found no difference between obese and non-obese patients in severity of solid organ injury after blunt abdominal trauma in the adult population. However, there was an increased rate of procedural intervention and mortality for obese patients with liver injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

A predictive grading scale for acute cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis presents in a spectrum of severity, where acute disease may be complicated by severe inflammation, gangrene, and perforation. The goal of this study is to outline an evidence-based grading scale that predicts patient outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with a preoperative diagnosis of acute cholecystitis who underwent LC from August 2011 until June 2015 at a tertiary-level hospital was performed. Patients who underwent elective cholecystectomy, incidental cholecystectomy, a planned open cholecystectomy, had gallstone pancreatitis or choledocholithiasis, and those admitted to a non-surgical service were excluded. Severity of disease was obtained from operative and pathology reports, and patients were classified according to the following grading scale:Grade I: symptomatic cholelithiasis.Grade II: acute/chronic cholecystitis.Grade III: gangrenous/necrotizing cholecystitis.Grade IV: gallbladder perforation or abscess.The groups were compared on age, gender, body mass index, severity of gallbladder disease, presence of preoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome, hospital length of stay, length of operation, complications within 30 days, conversion to open rate, and cost of hospitalization. RESULTS: During the study period, 1252 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were analyzed; 677 met inclusion criteria. The most common grade was grade 2, which was present in 80% of patients, followed by grade 3, which was found in 16% of patients. Grade 4 cholecystitis occurred in 1.2% of patients and grade 1 occurred in 3.2% of patients. There were statistically significant increases in age, presence of preoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome, hospital length of stay, conversion to open rate, cost of hospitalization, and length of operation with increased cholecystitis grade. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed grading scale is an accurate predictor of duration of operation, conversion to open rate, hospital length of stay, and cost of hospitalization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. STUDY TYPE: Prognostic.

Time is now: venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in blunt splenic injury.

BACKGROUND: The safety and timing of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients with blunt splenic injuries is not well known. We hypothesized that early initiation of VTE prophylaxis does not increase failure of nonoperative management or transfusion requirements in these patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of trauma patients with blunt splenic injury was performed. Patients were compared based on initiation and timing of VTE prophylaxis (<24 hours, 24 to 48 hours, 48 to 72 hours, and >72 hours). Patients who received VTE prophylaxis were matched with those who did not. Primary outcomes included were operation or angioembolization. RESULTS: A total of 497 patients (256 received VTE prophylaxis and 241 did not) were included. There was no difference in the number of interventions based on presence of or time to VTE prophylaxis initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Early initiation (<48 hours) of VTE prophylaxis is safe in patients with blunt splenic injuries treated nonoperatively, and may be safe as early as 24 hours.

Post-extubation dysphagia in trauma patients: it's hard to swallow.

BACKGROUND: There is a significant incidence of unrecognized postextubation dysphagia in trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, ascertain the risk factors, and identify patients with postextubation dysphagia who will require clinical swallow evaluation. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed on 270 trauma patients. Bedside clinical swallow evaluation was done within 24 hours of extubation. Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for confounding variables. RESULTS: The incidence of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in our study was 42%. Ventilator days was the strongest independent risk factor for OD (3.6 vs 8.0, P < .001). The odds ratio showed a 25% risk for OD for each additional ventilator day. Silent aspiration was found in 37% of patients with OD. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma patients requiring mechanical ventilation for ≥2 days are at increased risk for dysphagia and should undergo routine swallow evaluations after extubation.